MEFILES · Edition No. 27Today's edition · Archive · RSS
Seven files · One region · Zero illusions
Sudan Crisis Monitor The full edition of August 10, 2026 →
A Claim, Not a Rebuttal

Burhan Says No External Party Is Helping His Army, Six Days After Promising Victory Within the Year

Sudan’s army chief told Sudanese the war is existential and that the Sudanese Armed Forces fight unaided. The line is a sovereignty claim aimed at the mediators, not an answer to the charge that both sides are supplied from abroad.

Asharq Al-Awsat, the Saudi-owned London-based daily, reported on Sunday that Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, chairman of the Transitional Sovereignty Council and commander-in-chief of the Sudanese Armed Forces, said his army is fighting “with honor and dignity, without interference from any external party.” He called the conflict “the battle of all Sudanese and, for us, it is an existential battle,” and said of the campaign he calls the War of Dignity: “We are fighting rebels who have oppressed, violated, and committed crimes against everyone, and we are fighting them to rid the Sudanese people of this rebellion.” The report carried a Sudan News Agency video still taken in front of the Republican Palace in Khartoum. The utterance is on the record; the claims inside it are Burhan’s own. Note what the sentence does and does not do: it asserts that his side fights unaided. It does not address the allegation about the Rapid Support Forces and their backers.

Six days earlier, on roughly 3 August, Anadolu Agency and Sudan Tribune carried Burhan vowing to defeat the RSF by year-end and describing the army as advancing on all fronts. The two messages are addressed to the same audience. On 4 February, Sudan Tribune reported a US advisor saying the Quad — the United States, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — had reached a peace deal for Sudan; six months on, no deal is in force. On 25 February the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington think tank with a declared position on the file, recorded Burhan rejecting President Trump’s plan to end the war. On 17 April the State Department marked three years of conflict by pairing sanctions with an appeal for a humanitarian truce. Mada Masr reported around 25 July that Burhan was in Asmara with a ceasefire initiative and that a Burhan–Hemedti channel existed; that channel is unverified elsewhere.

Assessment: Two of the RSF’s and the army’s principal external patrons sit as mediators in the Quad. Burhan’s “no external party” line is best read as an application to be treated as a sovereign government rather than as one of two armed parties to be balanced — a status claim, priced for Riyadh, Cairo and Washington. Distrust it as description: it sits against the documented engagement of several capitals with Port Sudan and against the army’s own drone inventory. Note also what the July death sentences against Hemedti and fifteen others foreclose. A wartime court has removed the amnesty architecture any Quad settlement would require, while both belligerents keep announcing timetables no text supports.