MEFILES · Edition No. 29Today's edition · Archive · RSS
Seven files · One region · Zero illusions
Sudan Crisis Monitor The full edition of August 13, 2026 →
Four Cities, No Claimant

Drones Hit Khartoum, Atbara, El Damer and El Obeid Before Dawn, and No Force Has Claimed Them

Reuters counted eight drones over El Obeid and two dead, photographed a collapsed mosque wall in Khartoum North, and said explicitly it could not verify who launched the strikes or from where.

Drones struck four army-held cities in the hours before dawn on Wednesday 12 August: an area west of Omdurman and the Bahri district of Khartoum North, Atbara and El Damer on the Nile, and El Obeid in North Kordofan. Reuters correspondents Khalid Abdelaziz and Nafisa Eltahir reported eight drones over El Obeid, army air defences engaging them, and two people killed according to medical sources. The National, published in Abu Dhabi, gave at least two killed and six injured at El Obeid, labelled the figures as media reports it could not immediately confirm, and quoted residents saying the apparent target was a base housing the army’s Fifth Infantry Division. A mosque in the El-Droshab area of Khartoum North was hit; Reuters photographer El Tayeb Siddig recorded children beside a collapsed mosque wall, and AFP photographed residents clearing debris.

AFP described the Khartoum strike as the first after months of calm; Reuters dated the last drone attack on the capital to May. What no outlet produced was a claimant. The Rapid Support Forces did not claim the attacks. The Sudanese army did not immediately comment. Reuters stated it was unable to verify who launched the drones or from where, and The National’s headline used the word “suspected.” The only named-side sourcing in the day’s copy is an unnamed army source quoted by AFP and carried by Asharq Al-Awsat, who said the RSF had attacked the capital, El Obeid, Atbara and El Damer “with a large number of drones, which our anti-aircraft defenses engaged with.” That is an interested party, speaking anonymously, describing its own adversary and its own performance in the same sentence.

Assessment: A force that habitually publicises its long-range reach has said nothing for a full day about the most geographically ambitious strike set in three months. That silence is the story’s centre of gravity, not the tally. Two readings compete. One: the RSF wants the deniability, because hitting a mosque in Bahri and a garrison town simultaneously is harder to sell to the mediators in Jeddah and Addis than to its own base. Two: the attribution is being supplied for it, by an army source whose interest is in demonstrating both aggression received and air defence delivered. Until Wednesday’s operation is claimed, treat the geography as witnessed and the authorship as asserted.