MEFILES

Cairo assembles Eritrea, Somalia and Sudan as the Nile quarrel turns into a Red Sea quarrel

A first four-way summit at New Alamein, reciprocal expulsions with Addis Ababa and a presidential line that Egypt’s river share is “not negotiable” have merged two files Cairo used to run separately.

Around 1–2 October Ethiopia expelled an Egyptian diplomat without explanation and Cairo responded in kind, The National reported, in a rupture Addis Ababa frames around its accusation that Egypt is supporting rebels attacking federal forces — a conflict that has also broken Ethiopia’s relations with Eritrea. On Sunday 4 October, President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi hosted Eritrea’s Isaias Afwerki, Somalia’s Hassan Sheikh Mohamud and Sudan’s Gen. Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan at New Alamein, the first time the four leaders have met together. The Egyptian presidency described the purpose as co-ordination and consultation “on regional issues of interest”; The National, citing unnamed sources, reported the meeting would announce measures to consolidate the alliance including wider military co-operation — an anonymous claim, not an announced outcome. Egypt and Sudan warned against “unilateral measures” that harm downstream states.

The same day, Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly told CNN Business Arabic the Nile is a matter of “national security and existential importance” for a country drawing roughly 95 per cent of its water from the river, said Egypt remains committed to a diplomatic solution, and identified the real exposure: “The major challenge arises during multi-year droughts: how the dam is refilled could significantly impact Egypt’s water resources.” On 6 October El-Sisi hardened the position, calling Egypt’s share a “historical and legal” right that cannot be negotiated and saying Egypt “will not tolerate any action that touches its water security.” Ethiopia’s foreign ministry answered on the maritime axis, saying any serious discussion of regional security “must account for Ethiopia’s legitimate interests and its enduring connection to the Red Sea.” In Seoul on 8 October, El-Sisi told a joint press conference with President Lee Jae Myung that responsibility for Red Sea security and governance rests exclusively with its littoral states.

Washington’s intervention landed on a different axis again. The State Department said increasing cross-border tensions between Ethiopia and Eritrea “have the potential to affect the entire region” and urged both “to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of their neighbors, exercise maximum restraint and return to dialogue and cooperation.” The statement names Ethiopia and Eritrea. It does not name Egypt — which is, for Cairo, the preferred outcome: the summit’s diplomatic cost is carried by the parties already fighting, while Egypt appears as convener rather than belligerent. The National characterised El-Sisi’s 6 October remarks as “the latest sabre-rattling in Cairo’s water dispute with Ethiopia.” That is the outlet’s judgement rather than a reported fact, and it is worth separating from the quoted language, which was legal and defensive in form even where maximal in content.

Assessment: Watch the conversion, not the rhetoric. Cairo has spent a decade losing the GERD argument on hydrology and treaty law; recast as Red Sea littoral sovereignty, the same dispute recruits audiences — Gulf states, shipping insurers, European navies — that never cared about refill schedules. Ethiopia understood this immediately, which is why its reply was about access to the sea rather than about water. Two things to distrust: a summit billed as a first with no published mechanism, secretariat or follow-up date is still a photograph, and the military co-operation attached to it rests on unnamed sources in a single outlet. Note also that this coalition is built from three states with severe internal fragility. Egypt is the only member able to underwrite anything, and its canal revenue is halved.

Reserves set a ninth straight record while canal income stays below half its 2023 peak

The Central Bank reported $57.35bn at end-September. In the same week the prime minister put the Suez shortfall at more than $6bn a year, with the IMF programme expiring on 15 December and nothing named to replace it.

The Central Bank of Egypt said on Wednesday 7 October that net international reserves reached $57.3482 billion at the end of September, up $133.7 million from $57.2145 billion in August and $56.2939 billion in July. Arab News counts it as a ninth consecutive monthly record, up $7.81 billion or 15.8 per cent year-on-year. Composition reported via Arab Finance: gross reserves of $57.350 billion against $49.536 billion a year earlier, foreign currency holdings of $39.292 billion versus $33.649 billion, gold at $17.456 billion versus $15.843 billion, and SDRs of $602 million against $44 million. Within the month, currency holdings rose $1.74 billion while gold fell — Rio Times puts the decline at $1.6 billion — and the CBE has not said whether that is valuation or disposal. Flow support is real: remittances hit a record $47.3 billion in FY2025/26, up 29.6 per cent.

Against that stock sits the earnings hole. Madbouly told CNN Business Arabic on Sunday 4 October that Red Sea disruption has cut canal income by over $6 billion a year, from about $10 billion to $3.3 billion, recovering to roughly $4.4 billion — still less than half the record $10.25 billion of 2023. Suez Canal Authority chairman Osama Rabie reported on 20 September that August traffic rose 27 per cent year-on-year to 1,358 vessels, with revenue at $567.1 million against $326 million and net tonnage of 68.3 million against 45.2 million. He put FY2025/26 revenue at $4.67 billion, up 23 per cent, and forecasts $5.8–6 billion for calendar 2026 against about $4.1 billion a year earlier. The canal is handling 14,000–15,000 vessels, against roughly 26,000 in 2023. A transit surcharge adjustment took effect on 15 July.

The programme anchor goes in nine weeks. The $8 billion IMF facility expires on 15 December after one final review, which together with a climate fund review could release about $2.3 billion; the Fund’s latest review puts asset sales at only around $520 million by July — a figure found in this window only via the aggregator Rio Times and worth checking against Country Report 26/224 before it is relied on. Madbouly has said since June that no successor programme is needed, and the State Information Service records the same position. Growth came in at 5.1 per cent for FY2025/26, below the 5.3 per cent he cited in June, with 5.4 per cent targeted this year. The pound eased 0.44 per cent to 52.27 on 1 October, against a July Reuters poll of 15 economists projecting roughly 49 by end-FY2026/27. The overnight deposit rate was held at 19.00 per cent on 24 September; the next decision is 29 October.

Assessment: Read the two numbers as different things. The reserve record is a balance-sheet stock assembled from remittances, portfolio money attracted by a 19 per cent policy rate, and gold revaluation — all reversible, and none of it export earnings. The canal is the earnings line, and it is structurally short by more than half. Rabie’s $5.8–6 billion target implies the second half of 2026 carries the year almost alone, and no one has separated how much of the year-on-year rebound is the 15 July surcharge rather than ships. The thing to watch is absence: no successor financing framework has been named for 2027, and no new Gulf deposit or rollover surfaced this week. That is not a denial. It is simply unanswered, with the IMF exit dated.

One year after Sharm el-Sheikh, the ceasefire Egypt brokered is still being enforced by strikes

Today marks a year since the Gaza ceasefire was announced in Egypt. Israeli operations have continued at reduced scale, and Cairo’s reconstruction conference — the instrument that would give its mediation durable weight — still has no date.

Asharq Al-Awsat, filing on 9 October, marked the anniversary bluntly: 10 October 2026 is one year since the announcement of an end to the war in Gaza, “even as Israel continues to wage it on a smaller scale, killing more Palestinians and destroying their homes on the grounds that Hamas refuses to disarm.” The Associated Press, in a 7 October piece, reported that Israeli strikes in the year since the ceasefire was announced have resulted in more than 1,400 additional deaths — a figure carried on a single wire, with the sourcing for the toll not stated in the copy reviewed here. At the close of the Sharm el-Sheikh talks, President Donald Trump declared: “After years of suffering and bloodshed, the war in Gaza is over.” On 9 October a coalition of groups said the ceasefire now exists in “name only”; Al Jazeera reported demonstrations on 8 October marking the third anniversary of the 7 October attack with calls for a ceasefire.

For Cairo the anniversary is an audit of its principal non-financial asset. Egypt’s claim to indispensability in Washington, Jerusalem and the Gulf rests on having produced the Sharm agreement, and that claim decays at the rate the agreement does. The lever Egypt still holds is reconstruction: it has trailed a donors' conference repeatedly, and no date for it appeared in any of the reporting reviewed for this edition. Nor could the operational status of the Rafah crossing on the ceasefire’s first anniversary be established — the most recent confirmations available describe a limited February reopening and a reported full reopening around 1 September, neither of which settles what is moving through the crossing this week, in which direction, or under whose inspection.

Assessment: Egypt’s mediation is being spent faster than it is being replenished. A ceasefire that holds as a framework while strikes continue inside it leaves the broker carrying the reputational cost of enforcement without the authority to enforce. The reconstruction conference is the one instrument that would convert the Sharm moment into standing infrastructure and money flowing through Egyptian contractors and Egyptian ports — and it remains undated, which suggests the financing, not the diplomacy, is the blockage. Set this against the Horn: Cairo is opening a second theatre requiring summitry, coalition maintenance and possibly deployments, in the same month its IMF programme expires. Mediation capital is finite, and it is being drawn on from two directions at once.