Eisenkot’s coalition clock runs while unity talks with Likud collapse and reopen inside a day
President Herzog handed the mandate over on 8 November, setting a first deadline of 6 December. Three days later the two largest blocs had already broken off and resumed negotiations once each.
Isaac Herzog announced on Saturday evening, 7 November, that he would task Yashar leader Gadi Eisenkot with forming the next government, and granted the mandate at the President’s Residence on Sunday the 8th. Under Basic Law: The Government that gives Eisenkot 28 days, to 6 December, with a presidential extension of up to 14 further days available. Fox News reported that 67 lawmakers recommended him against 46 for Netanyahu. Al Jazeera puts Likud’s first-place finish at 27 seats and the two Arab-led lists, the Joint List and Ra’am, at 19 between them; 61 is the threshold. Haaretz characterised Eisenkot’s acceptance remarks as a signal that he will backtrack on campaign promises about coalition partnerships and seek “creative” solutions to the deadlock — the paper’s framing of his speech, not a direct quotation.
On Monday Netanyahu released a video calling on the opposition bloc to join a single government, saying it was “the need of the hour” and that it “needs to include all the parties in the national camp, which also includes the haredi (ultra-Orthodox) parties.” On Tuesday the 26th Knesset was sworn in; Netanyahu’s speech attacked the Arab parties, and Yashar announced it had cancelled Wednesday’s scheduled meeting with Likud representatives over what the Times of Israel reported it called a “divisive speech.” Israel Hayom carried the exchange of party statements: Yashar’s “Netanyahu does not want unity,” and Likud saying it remained open to talks while criticising negotiations with “supporters of terrorism.” Fox News attributed the word “delusional” to Eisenkot describing the speech; we did not find it in an Israeli original.
By Wednesday Netanyahu was again saying a unity government remained possible, per Ynet, while losing the first procedural fight of the new Knesset over the composition of the Arrangements Committee — coalition whip Ofir Katz had submitted a competing proposal for an 18-member body apportioned at one seat per seven lawmakers, a formula that would have favoured Netanyahu’s bloc. Bezalel Smotrich moved in both directions inside 24 hours: on Tuesday the Times of Israel reported him urging the Haredi parties to reject negotiations with Eisenkot’s bloc and calling on Yashar MK Matan Kahana to refuse the Knesset speakership if elected with Arab support; by Wednesday Ynet’s sub-head had him urging Netanyahu and Eisenkot to sit down together. The bloc is separately seeking to replace Speaker Amir Ohana of Likud “as soon as possible.”
Assessment: The two breakdowns in three days are not noise, they are the negotiation. Netanyahu’s incentive as head of the largest party with the smaller recommendation count is to make unity the only frame in which he survives; Eisenkot’s is to demonstrate that unity on Netanyahu’s terms is unavailable, without being the man who refused to talk. Both performed exactly that. Watch the Arrangements Committee rather than the speeches — committee apportionment is where a 67-to-46 recommendation is converted into actual control, and the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that the lead story turns on is downstream of it. Treat Smotrich’s Wednesday position as provisional until it survives a night.