Washington announces a humanitarian truce push for the fourth time in twelve months
Massad Boulos told Sky News Arabia the United States is working with partners on a humanitarian truce in Sudan. The three-month truce the Quad first proposed on 12 September 2025 has still not begun.
Massad Boulos, President Trump’s adviser for Arab and African affairs, said on 19 September that Washington is working with regional and international partners on a diplomatic push for a humanitarian truce in Sudan; The National framed the effort as running through the Quad — the United States, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. It is a statement of intent, on the record and from a named official, but nothing was announced as agreed. The sequence it belongs to is now a year old. The Quad’s joint statement of 12 September 2025, published by the State Department, set out a three-month humanitarian truce converting at expiry into a permanent ceasefire and then a political process. On 3 February 2026 Boulos said the Quad had a peace document “acceptable to both parties” and named a $1.5 billion support target. As of today, 375 days after it was first proposed, the truce has not started.
What the interval produced instead is in the food security data. The IPC’s special report for February 2026–January 2027 put 19.5 million people — roughly 41 per cent of the population — in Phase 3 or above for February to May 2026, including about 135,000 in Phase 5 and more than five million in Phase 4, with Risk of Famine identified in 14 areas of North, South and West Darfur and South Kordofan. Its projection for June–September 2026 was that the Phase 5 population would rise to around 200,000. That projection window closes at the end of this month and the outcome is not yet published. The IPC itself says it is “highly likely that the true scale of food insecurity and malnutrition across Sudan far exceeds the data” — conditions in Al Fasher, Kadugli, Dilling and parts of South Kordofan are too volatile to classify for some 841,000 people.
The war economy the truce would have to touch has kept working throughout. SWISSAID, drawing on UAE trade statistics newly published in UN Comtrade, reported in April that the Emirates imported 29 tonnes of gold directly from Sudan in 2024, up from 17 tonnes in 2023, alongside 27 tonnes via Egypt, 18 via Chad and nine via Libya. The Sudan Transparency and Policy Tracker, a Sudanese policy outfit that is not neutral on Port Sudan’s economic management, estimates that between 50 and 80 per cent of production is now smuggled — a very wide band. The cost is paid at the pit face: on 16 September the al-Zara artisanal mine collapsed at En Nahud in RSF-held West Kordofan, killing at least 82 people, with more than 50 injured, according to BBC figures logged by CFR. Such tolls are routinely revised upward.
Assessment: Treat announcements of a truce as a measure of American attention, not of Sudanese battlefield reality. The Quad’s structural problem is that two of its four members are widely alleged to sit on opposite sides of the war’s supply lines, which makes the forum simultaneously the only one with leverage and the reason leverage is never applied. Watch three things rather than the next statement: whether the IPC’s June–September projection lands at or above 200,000 people in Phase 5 when it publishes; whether the Panel of Experts mandate was renewed on time and with new designations; and whether anything about gold routing changes. A truce that does not alter who exports the metal alters nothing that funds the fighting.